Endurance racing causes more deaths than the Grand National

Why do horse lovers put their horses through such endangerment?

If you have watched the above video you might begin to understand where I am coming from with this article and why I cannot understand why horse lovers are willing to put them through such endangerment for their own thrills.

In the UK, races like the Golden Button Challenge, are becoming increasingly popular judging by the number of videos taken and posted on YouTube, which involve horses falling, refusing to jump and being put through some punishing riding and less than desirable treatment. I find watching these distressing but obviously equine enthusiasts believe differently . I am of the opinion that horses are not natural jumpers or designed to be pushed to the limit by being ridden at speed over long distances and expected to traverse high jumps, rough ground and wide ditches. The jury is still out on this point but there is some evidence to substantiate it.

Endurance racing gets little attention

We are at that time of the year again when many people become extremely excited about watching a large field of horses stampeding over high fences supposedly to test their stamina and speed while risking death and injury from falls and collisions. Although anti-racing campaigners concentrate on deaths caused at iconic races such as the Grand National, endurance racing  receives little attention by the media and campaigners and yet cause far more deaths and abuse.

Endurance racing is a niche equine extreme sport which has spread across the world over the last few decades and provides thrills for the riders but hell for the horses. There are international and national events held all over the world, but the sport is most popular in the Arab States whose horses dominate, but countries like the USA, France, Australia and  South Africa  also take part. Because of the huge financial benefits and the competitive nature of the sport there are deaths, injuries, doping scandals and serious welfare issues surrounding it.

The races involve long-distance riding of 100 kilometres or more across often desolate areas like deserts with extreme temperatures. They are conducted against the clock just like long distance cycling races with convoys of team vehicles speeding alongside. Bottles of water are thrown to the riders to both drink and douse the horses. It is all about testing the horses’ endurance and speed and the riders theoretically must manage the stamina and fitness of their horses by the effective use of pace, thorough knowledge of their horses’ capabilities and ability to cross all kinds of terrain. The fact that the races have a “vet-gate” every 40 kms so that their fitness to continue can be checked is an indication of how the horses can suffer.

Win at all costs mentality.

The above video gives some idea of what the horses experience. Apart from tough training techniques being used, which often cause fractured leg bones, injuries are often not given enough time to heal between races there by debilitating the horses. The use of prohibited substances is allegedly rife and in the past nine participants, including well-known showjumpers, dressage riders and trainers were implicated in it and suspended for administering them. Some riders are accused of a win at all costs’ methodology, riding horses at over 40 kph over rough terrain.

The sport is administered by an organisation called the ‘FEI’ who insist the horses’ welfare is at the heart of it, which is of course a nonsense, as there is no necessity for the sport to exist or to put the horses through such hardship. Their Code of Conduct for the welfare of the horse and “Clean Sports campaign 2010” states that:

“the entire equine community – athletes, veterinarians, grooms, managers, coaches, owners and officials help combat doping and the inappropriate use of medications through better education and increased vigilance”.

The sport is littered with injuries and deaths including six horses dying within 22 days in 2017, some from ‘catastrophic injuries,’ during races at the Dubai International Endurance City (DIEC) built and operated by Sheikh Mohammed specifically to host these races. Two horses were euthanised at a 90 km endurance ride in Fontainbleau, France in October 2016 and a rider-less horse escaping onto an auto route suffered fatal injuries.

Most horse lovers and owners will no doubt disagree with my comments, but there is something very wrong with what they are put through to accommodate this ‘sport’  and it may be time to have an inquiry into these activities.

Finn’s Law – better late than never.

Finn’s law came into force in June, 2019

Injured German Shepherd with stab wounds.
Finn the police dog with stab wounds to head and chest soon after major surgery to save his life.

Why did it take so long to protect UK police dogs and horses with Finn’s Law.

Until recently police dogs and horses have always been treated just as a piece of police equipment or property. Countries have been extremely slow at recognising the need to protect them and it has often taken too many tragic incidents and thwarted campaigns to force lawmakers to do so. The UK, the great nation of animal lovers, has followed its usual path in lagging behind other countries in protecting service animals and like most countries has only done it through public pressure.

New Zealand has protected its police dogs since 2008 with the Policing Act 2008 (Killing or injuring Police Dogs) and has recently increased the punishment under the Policing (Killing a Police Dog) Amendment Bill 2016 to 5 years in line with many other countries and 2 years for injuring a dog plus a NZ$15,000 fine.

The USA has had protection in place since 2000 under the Federal Law Enforcement Animal Protection Act with up to 10 years in prison and a $1000 fine for assaulting, maiming or killing federal law enforcement dogs and horses following many attacks on them and drug dealers putting bounties on narcotics sniffer dogs, but State laws vary.

Police dog handlers have to fight for the rights of their dogs.

Finn's Law. Injured police dog
Major the police dog paralysed in a stabbing with his handler, Officer John Jorgensen.

On the 12th. November, 2010 in Roseville, Minnesota, USA, Officer John Jorgensen sent  his police dog Major into a wooded area to chase after intruders and within minutes he found Major covered in blood and rushed him to the vet where he was found to have suffered four stab wounds puncturing the lung and damaging the spinal cord resulting in permanent paralysis of his hind legs. Although it was a felony to kill a state police dog, assaulting one was treated at the time as a mere misdemeanour so the attacker only served 4 months. The officer was so appalled at the lack of protection of his partner that he began a campaign for more stringent laws in the State which he succeeded in.

In August 2013 in Adelaide, South Australia a police dog named Koda was  stabbed in the chest in the line of duty when he caught up with a knife-wielding man following a burglary. He was stabbed in the chest causing a 8 c.m.-deep wound and was rushed to a vet where he underwent emergency surgery and survived.  The incident was greeted with public outrage as no law existed to prosecute the offender and following a campaign a new law, known as “Koda’s Law” was introduced.

Finn's Law. Police horses wearing eye and face shields and leg protection.
We are already having to kit police horses out with protective gear to avoid injuries.

On the 5th. October, 2016 in Stevenage, Hertfordshire, UK a 16-year-old boy stabbed a police dog named Finn in the chest and head causing life threatening injuries, but he survived following surgery and weeks of treatment. It sparked outrage and there was a campaign, including a website and Facebook page for Finn, involving his handler PC Wardell to enact a law to protect them , something that should have been included under the Animal Welfare Act back in 2006 but was either overlooked or not felt necessary.

UK Government slow to introduce Finn’s Law and come to the rescue of police dogs and horses.

A petition was launched which stated “I propose that UK police dogs and horses be given protection that reflects their status if assaulted in the line of duty. This would be similar to the US Federal Law Enforcement Animal Protection”, but prior to the petition being debated the Government responded by saying “It is unnecessary to give police animals the same legal status as officers in light of the penalties already in place”. This was not helped by a delay caused by Sir Christopher Chope MP who unbelievably objected to the new proposed law.  Such is the UK’s commitment to animal welfare.

Despite this a new amendment, the Animal Welfare (Service Animals) Amendment, to the Animal Welfare Act, which has been dubbed “Finn’s law,” was finally  debated by the Lords and came into force on 7th. June 2019. It is obviously better late than never but it seems sad that we haven’t found it necessary to help our police dogs and horses much sooner.

Is it time to reduce the usage of animals on front line duties?

Having such a law is obviously to be applauded, but it is not unfortunately going to solve the problem of attacks on police animals in the future and brings into focus the danger we put these animals in on our behalf. It raises the question of whther it is ethically and morally fair to intentionally put animals in harms way in the first place?  Would it not be better to restrict them to ceremonial use or purely as “search” and “sniffer” dogs who appear to have a fun time at work.

Updated June 2020