It is time to take Police horses off front-line duties.

A horse’s role must be hazardous if it needs protective gear just like it’s human colleagues.

Police horses wearing eye and face shields and leg protection.
Police horses with protective gear for their eyes, faces and legs to avoid injuries.

In this modern era of drunkeness and violence police horses and dogs are coming under increasing risk of being injured. Every football season horses supposedly there to protect citizens are injured and attacked by those they are there to protect. There is also the element that many people have no respect for animals as was obvious in an incident at a recent football match.

At the end of September 2019 at a Portsmouth – Southampton derby match, a 42 year old fan who surely should have known better, punched a police horse, ran away, was chased by the mounted officer and was arrested for animal cruelty and attempted criminal damage. The tragedy is that until he was chased by a dozen police officers he was finding the whole incident funny. See video.

In 2018, a police horse name “Morecombe” tragically died on Easter Monday while patrolling a League One football match between Blackpool and Fleetwood Town, having slipped while “responding to reports of disorder”. The Police rider was taken by air ambulance to hospital, but poor Morecombe  was pronounced dead at the scene after falling on a metal pole which punctured his stomach.

We are now well into the 21st century, with the Police possessing high-tech equipment for every eventuality including tasers, pepper spray, stab vests, high performance cars, big red keys, helicopters and who knows what and yet police forces around the world still seem unable to combat crime or deal with disturbances without resorting to using horses on the front-line putting them at risk of injury and death.

Back in November 2105 six police horses were injured when they were “glassed” by protesters during the million mask march in Central London. A horse named Embassy suffered serious injuries to his side, rear fetlock and front leg and others suffered glass injuries to their hind legs and one an eye injury caused by a stick. A woman was attacked by a demonstrator while trying to aid one of the horses and a mounted officer suffered a broken wrist. Such incidents are not uncommon.

I can unfortunately remember the awful scenes of police horses being attacked by vengeful coal miners during the riots in the seventies and we obviously haven’t moved on. In fact it is probably worse as in today’s society, where stabbing and shooting people has become common practice, there are no qualms about attacking or injuring a horse regardless of the new “Finn’s law”. We already resort to providing horses with protective guards for their eyes, faces and legs. Is it really necessary to keep using them in this way?

Six times more likely to speak to a policeman sitting on a horse.

According to research in 2014 by Oxford University and RAND Europe, police horses spend 60-70% of their working hours wandering the streets to increase the profile of the police and up to 20% employed in keeping public order at football matches and demonstrations with the rest taken up by ceremonial duties.

The advantages of having horses patrolling is that they have a “positive effect on public reassurance and helps keep people safe” according to Bernard Higgins an Assistant Chief Constable. They also have a “higher level of visibility giving more trust and confidence in the Police” as being 12 feet tall with the rider the public cannot miss them and tend to remember seeing them. This apparently gives a sense of  a better police presence rather than a policeman on foot. South and West Yorkshire police go as far as to say they are a “strong operational resource” and have decided to keep their horses.

We are apparently six times more likely to speak to a police officer on a horse than standing on his own two feet and the “novelty value”  encourages children and adults to approach to stroke the horse and engage in conversation.

If this research is correct it would seem more helpful to the police to have the horses solely on these public relations and ceremonial duties and remove them entirely from the 20% of dangerous situations. But there is also the question of whether the horses’ health and safety is compromised by being on slippery and traffic filled streets under any circumstances.

The UK’s forces are really in trouble if they have to use police horses because they believe their officers are unapproachable without them.

It would seem from this research that the UK Police are paranoid about their perceived image and believe the public are either frightened of them, hate them or find them unapproachable without a horse under them. If this is so it is a sad situation if they believe the public have more trust in a horse than themselves.

It might be that budget controls may solve the problem anyway as the number of mounted sections has reduced from 17 to only 12 recently. Nottinghamshire police decided to disbanded theirs in 2012,  as did Cleveland  whose Chief Constable stated it was “one of the hardest decisions and no way a reflection on the section itself”. They gave away their four horses to The Horse Trust charity to look after.

Other forces are doing their best to hang onto them. Merseyside Police were so desperate that in 2018 they considered getting corporate sponsorship for them and company logos on their saddles. An adopt a horse scheme was also considered and even a dinner with the Chief Constable at the Grand National.

Thames Valley,  Cleveland and Gloucester have also considered going down that road. Gloucestershire constabulary  have in fact just reinstated their mounted section after a 70 year absence on the basis it would raise their profile and the crime commissioner Martin Surl stated that research “shows people love to meet horses and it means officers are making more contact with the public on a daily basis.” They have borrowed horses and a horse-box from other forces.

Everyone loves to see a police horse and there is probably a good case to continue with them as “meeters and greeters” and for ceremonial purposes, but surely if the main purpose is to make the police more approachable and visible isn’t it time to get the officers out of their cars and onto the beat.

Updated June 2020

Related articles:

Grand National – Carnage or Spectacle?

The excitement of the 2019 Grand National is over and it is time for the usual post mortem. One horse killed and another taken away by ambulance appears according to the media and racing authorities to have been a pretty good result. Two other horses, Forest des Aigles and Crucial Role, were also euthanised the day before but have received little attention. Track authorities and the British Horse Association (BHA) are obviously saddened again and Dickon White, of the Jockey Club  Stated:

“As a sport of animal lovers, we wanted every horse to come home – and sadly that’s not been the case with Up For Review”

a statement which makes it is difficult to get one’s head round what qualifies as being an animal lover these days. The media state that “38 runners returned safely” – but returned safely to where? Obviously their stable as they didn’t finish the race. Only 19 (47%) out of 40 actually past the finishing post.

Riderless race horse

It is not difficult to deduce from the statistics that most of the horses present just provide the spectacle and have no chance at all of competing or finishing the race. People watch the National for the excitement and anticipation of the stampede to the first fence when everyone holds their breath to see if they get over safely or fall. But do some racegoers secretly hope that there will be a spectacular pile up rather like in Formula One when the cars approach the first bend  or the cycle riders in the Tour de France. There is a certain element of wishing for tragedy as no one wants a “boring”race.

Carnage at the fences.

This year at the first fence Up For Review was brought down by another faller and was fatally injured and at the sixth fence three fell and one pulled up. So we had already lost 8 horses by the sixth fence and then the race continued without incident until we get to the 21st fence where a horse pulled up. Horses were then pulled up or refused at the 25th, 26th, and at the 27th a rider was unseated, then 4 horses refused or pulled up at the 28th and 5 at the 29th.

There is an obvious pattern here: the attrition rate increases the further into the race they get when more horses find that the going is too tough. These are all horses that are perhaps not fit or strong enough to last the course – the cannon fodder to make the race a spectacle and for who the race is too much of a challenge. It’s not science, but seems logical that horses tire just like humans in marathons or steeplechases and cannot find that last effort to finish.

The race is 14 fences too long & involves too many horses.

The racing fraternity are proud that the National is the longest National Hunt race in Britain and that it is the ultimate test of horse and jockey jumping 30 fences over a distance of 2.25 miles. And this is the problem. The race is too long, has too many high jumps and too many participants.

Many campaigners including the RSPCA believe the best way forward is to work with the authorities to improve the welfare of the horses during the race which they state they have done successfully for the last thirty years and list many so-called improvements, but most of these are just peripheral to the main problem. Thirty years on we still have horses dying and suffering and being injured and more importantly horses being pushed beyond their limits.

There is no chance of the race being banished in the foreseeable future because of all the tradition and history behind it just like fox-hunting, not to mention the huge financial benefits to everyone involved. And of course supporters want carnage and spectacle not just any old horse race, because this is what they watch it for. The only way of reducing the suffering is to shorten the race to one lap of the course, cut the numbers involved and lower the fences, but this is never going to happen.

Related articles: