What has religion ever done for animals.

Religion has not been a great friend of animals.

Granted, Noah did allegedly save quite a few of them on his ark, but apart from that what has theology ever done for their welfare and rights? Religious creeds and their interpretations have throughout history deeply ingrained our belief that we have total dominion over animals to do as we want. It is one of the few beliefs that all religions seem to share and back in the day when religion was of more relevance and widely followed, it entrenched our attitudes towards animals and how we should treat them continuing right up to the present day. Prior to this many ancient civilisations revered them and had looked upon them as gods with souls and powers.

Beings without mind, reason, souls or status.

Religious attitudes to animals is a complex subject with each religion having its own take on the position of animals in society which varies considerably from culture to culture around the world. Mostly though, all animals have been thought to be beings without mind, reason, immortal soul or moral status, with the emphasis on man being more special to God than non-humans. History is littered with ancient sages, philosophers and theologists who have interpreted the teachings of various religions and set the standards by which we view and should treat them. Generally, theology has not been a great friend to animals.

In the ancient Middle East, the cradle of western culture, the domestication of animals resulted in them having to be debased to elevate human beings above them. Prior to this, ancient civilisations had looked upon many animals as gods and deities. Although the common theme amongst most religions is that they should be shown respect and compassion, they still do not deserve any rights.

Their life and death subject to our use.

Western beliefs were heavily influenced by Christianity which has always maintained that they were put on earth to serve human beings and as St Augustine put it: “by a most just ordinance of the Creator, both animals’ life and their death are subjects to our use”. Most original versions of the Bible gave humans “dominion” over all living creatures with some christian faiths going as far as to tell their followers to “rule over every living thing, multiply and fill the earth and subdue it”.  

Religion

The Christian Bible has an unfortunate habit of describing them as beasts and is all for going out and killing them, even spreading fear and dread on them. The Christian tradition supported the ideological justification for the abuse of animals right up until the 19th century, when conversely certain Christians started animal welfare charities.

Eastern religion more benevolent.

On the other hand, most Asian or Eastern religions appear to have a more benevolent attitude towards them, if not always so in practice, believing that a human soul could pass into the body of an animal or even that we could be reincarnated as one.

Jainism (part of Hinuism) is the closest you will come to finding a religion that cares strongly about animals and their place in the world and followers avoid causing injury to all life and have a reverence of all creatures. Animals are recognized as sentient beings with feelings and emotions. Jains are obviously vegetarians and some devotees even brush the ground to sweep away life forms they might step on, preferring to be bitten by a snake than kill it.

Islam basically follows the Christian line that humans are the centre of the universe and animals were put here purely to benefit us. The Quran describes them as ‘muslim,’ as they were created by Allah to live and obey Allah’s laws in the natural world.  But Allah apparently loved all animals and dictated that they must be treated with kindness and compassion.

Historically Judaism placed great emphasis on the proper treatment of animals and the prevention of “Tsa’ar ba’alei chayim” or suffering of living creatures to the extent that causing unnecessary cruelty to them is forbidden and in this they were far ahead of Western civilisation.

Hinduism mostly teaches that animals and plants are not just objects for wanton human use and consumption. They play an important part in Hindu myths and legends adorning temples and depicted as Gods and Goddesses. They have a compassionate if not complex approach to animals and fundamental regard for their ethical treatment. 

Buddhists try to do as little harm as possible to animals and avoid any work that requires killing them as they believe all beings are afraid of injury and death. Animals and humans are treated with equal respect and kindness is shown to all beings, believing through the doctrine of karma that cruel acts to animals should be avoided as they may be paid for in future life.

Unfortunately, with the rush of modern development and western cultural influences, the basic doctrine of eastern religions of respect, and the benefits received by not harming or killing them, does not have the same relevance and reverence as it once did.

Did God love animals?

It is difficult to determine whether ‘God’ in all his/her guises was a supporter of animal welfare and rights as the teachings of the various divinities have been interpreted in so many different ways, but the creed of imposing our will over them remains the basic theme. Psychologically it makes humans feel empowered and manifests itself in our obsession with training or forcing them to obey, behave, do tricks, work and die on our behalf. We still see no problem in killing them out of hand to feed us, keeping up the old traditions of using them as beasts of burden and recently taking a retrograde step in hunting them with bows and arrows for sport, so in many respects we haven’t really moved on at all from our ancient past.

Related articles:

Whales injure tourists. Why can’t we leave wild animals in peace.

The fact that these gentle whales were using “classic defensive actions” is proof that they were upset and stressed.

Recently on Ningaloo reef off the north west coast of Australia there have been three incidents in just one week involving tourists being seriously injured while swimming with whales on new organised tours. A 27 year old woman suffered broken ribs and internal bleeding when hit by a humpback whale and had to be flown by Flying Doctor to Perth for treatment. A week later another woman suffered the same fate and there have been other incidents to tourists causing minor injuries. All this because entrepreneurs want to add another extreme tourist attraction to visiting the reef. As if disturbing them by shadowing them with boats is not intrusive enough.

In all these incidents there was no malice on the part of the whales just humans getting in their way and upsetting them and posing a perceived threat to their calves. As one tour operator put it:

The whale immediately swam straight at the group [of tourists] to place herself between her group and her calf and she then engaged in a number of really classic defensive actions right next to the group including slapping her pectoral fins onto the water and slapping her tail down into the water. Unfortunately when she was doing that one of the swimmers was hit by her tail and another was hit by her pectoral fin less seriously. .

Nine News, Perth

These new swimming encounters are being monitored by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions in the Ningaloo Marine Park and will undoubtedly be a great success. They are scheduled to become a permanent licensed industry in 2021 at the completion of a five-year trial and all kinds of regulations, codes of practice and safety procedures are being trialed just so someone can make money out of it, when in fact for the safety and wellbeing of all concerned it would be sensible to ban such ventures. The big question is whether a Government conservation department should be encouraging such ventures.

Child swimming with humpback whale
A young snorkeller swimming with a Humpback and calf. Sensible or irresponsible.

We all want to be a David Attenborough.

It regrettably seems that there are no limits to the lengths we will go to disturb and stress wild animals in their natural habit in our pursuit of getting up close and personal with them. It is a compulsion that appears to be fueled by social media and wanting to emulate the exploits of icons like David Attenborough Steve Irwin and other wildlife presenters, adventurers and celebrities we see on TV. We have this belief that animals only exist to entertain us and have no interests in a life of their own. Everybody wants to get a piece of animals.

Whether it be be swimming with dolphins, aggravating sharks from the safety of cages, disturbing egg laying turtles, damaging coral, having selfies with drugged up tigers, monkeys or snakes, visiting gorillas or riding on elephants, everybody wants a piece of the action. It is on everyone’s bucket list to get up close and personal with an exotic animal and to have a selfie or photograph taken to put on social media despite the stress, suffering and disturbance caused to the animals.

The problem now is that there are too many people wanting to do it and this just encourages more such wildlife encounters to make it easy for us and we selfishly give little thought to the stress or suffering we may be causing. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with wanting to be in the presence of animals but there has to be a compromise and it should be done from a discreet distance and the right reasons. It should be a respectful and personal experience and not to just to get a selfie photograph or to touch the animal. Unfortunately we are reaching a point where we cannot all be a David Attenborough. We can already view marine animals from a boat we do not need to get in the water with them.

Related articles: